You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 1, July 4, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fireworks-Related Injuries, King County, Washington, 1983 to 1985

Michael J. O'Leary, MD, MPH
Centers for Disease Control Atlanta

Charles F. Evans, MPA; John M. Kobayashi, MD, MPH
Washington State Department of Social and Health Services Seattle

JAMA. 1986;256(1):37-38.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Each year in the United States, an estimated 8000 to 10 000 visits to the emergency department are prompted by fireworksrelated injuries.1 Since 1983, we have been conducting active surveillance for such injuries at 31 emergency facilities in King County, Washington, which includes Seattle.

Until 1982, fireworks laws in Washington were restrictive, allowing only nonexplosive ground devices. In 1982 and 1983, most firecrackers and certain aerial display devices were added to the list of legal fireworks. In 1984, firecrackers reverted to illegal status, and in 1985 aerial devices became illegal in certain municipalities only.

The number of fireworks-related injuries declined from 146 in 1983 to 121 in 1984 and to 107 in 1985. Fifty-two percent of the injured persons were younger than 16 years of age, and 70% of the injured were males. In all years, burns were common, accounting for 67% of all visits to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.