You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 11, September 19, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Failure of Recommended Treatment for Secondary Syphilis-Reply

Richard C. Reichman, MD; David M. Markovitz, MD
The University of Rochester Medical Center Rochester, NY

JAMA. 1986;256(11):1443-1444.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

We appreciate the comments of Dr Fiumara regarding our recently published case report. The article describes a case of clinical relapse of secondary syphilis after treatment with the CDC's recommended regimen.1,2 It was not our intention to indicate that the CDC guidelines are "inadequate" but rather to demonstrate that failures do occur and to stress the importance of careful follow-up. In fact, we suggest that the present regimen should continue to be employed until appropriately controlled studies demonstrate superiority of an alternative approach.

We are familiar with Dr Fiumara's extensive experience using a total of 4.8 million units of penicillin G benzathine intramuscularly to treat primary and secondary syphilis. We take issue, however, with his suggestion that a study comparing 2.4 and 4.8 million units of intramuscular penicillin G benzathine has already been performed. In the study to which he refers,3 a treatment arm employing 4.8 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.