You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 21, December 5, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

A Twin Study of Obesity-Reply

Albert J. Stunkard, MD
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Philadelphia

Terryl T. Foch, PhD; Zdenek Hrubec, ScD
National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Md

JAMA. 1986;256(21):2959.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

We appreciate Dr Knight's pointing out the importance of context in interpreting the findings of our twin study of obesity. As he notes, concordance rates and heritability estimates are critically dependent on the environment in which they are measured, and different environments can give rise to different estimates of heritability. The role of environment is particularly important in assessing obesity, in which gene-environment interaction must surely be of great importance. And as he (and we) have noted, such interaction is not measured in twin studies. This limitation makes it important to assess the role of genetics in human obesity by methods that can assess gene-environment interaction. Adoption studies constitute one such method, and a recent adoption study1 has confirmed the importance of genetic factors in human obesity.

The data of our study do not, as Dr Knight says, support general conclusions regarding the relative roles of heredity . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.