This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert Carlen, MD
Sayville, NY

JAMA. 1986;256(5):592.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

I am grateful to Dr Cates¹ for calling attention to my ideas.^2,3

Dr Cates says, "No data support the assertion that relatively small financial incentives may influence the vicissitudes of sexual decision making and/ or behavior." But he presents no data that refute what is, if nothing else, a sound economic presumption.

Patients with venereal disease are not stupid. They know that condoms cost them money but treatment is free so therefore it's economically irrational to buy condoms, and they don't. If we establish economically irrational policies then we're irrational, too. No one should be surprised if they fail.

Dr Cates says it's cheaper for the public to treat sexually transmitted diseases earlier than later. I'm sure he's right.

But his argument can be made for every treatable illness or injury: breast cancer, for example, or diabetic retinopathy. People with serious conditions may eventually become . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?