You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 256 No. 7, August 15, 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (2)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Predicting Aminoglycoside Nephrotoxicity

Richard D. Moore, MD; Craig R. Smith, MD; Paul S. Lietman, MD, PhD
The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore

JAMA. 1986;256(7):864-865.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

We wish to offer several comments concerning the publication by Lam and collegues.1

  1. Since publication of our study,2 we have applied our discriminant function prospectively to 143 sequential medical and surgical patients (no exclusions) hospitalized at Johns Hopkins. Plots of the distributions of the discriminant sums and the associated probabilities of nephrotoxicity for the patients who did and did not develop nephrotoxicity are shown in Fig 1. Using these data, the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of our discriminant function can be determined for any selected classification cutoff point. For example, using a cutoff point of 0.75 (0.25 probability) to define a positive test result, the following table is generated:

Formula

Thus, the sensitivity is 73% (11/15), the specificity is 84% (108/128), the predictive value of a positive test result is 36% (11/31), and the predictive value of a negative test result is 96% (108/112).

We have shown in a separate patient . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.