You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 13, April 1, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intravenous Cocaine, Crack, and HIV Infection

Don C. Des Jarlais, PhD
New York State Division of Substance Abuse Services New York

Samuel R. Friedman, PhD
Narcotic and Drug Research Inc New York

JAMA. 1988;259(13):1945-1946.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Over the last several years, there has been increasing attention to the transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) through the sharing of equipment for the injection of illicit drugs. Intravenous (IV) drug users constitute the second largest group of persons to have developed acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) in the United States and Europe and are emerging as the largest source of heterosexual transmission in both areas.1 Although illicit drug injection is commonly associated with heroin addiction, it clearly is not the drug being injected that is responsible for the transmission of HIV. Cocaine injection may prove to be one of the more difficult aspects of preventing AIDS among IV drug users. Cocaine injection is quite common among persons who inject heroin—over 83% of the heroin users in our New York studies2 had also injected cocaine in the previous two years. There is no chemotherapy for . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.