This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Edna Strauss, MD
University of São Paulo (Brazil)

JAMA. 1988;259(24):3559-3560.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In an interesting article, Bensabath et al¹ suggest that delta virus infection is the preponderant cause of Labrea hepatitis. They declare that the clinical picture of the classic form of massive hepatic necrosis is indistinguishable from the fulminant steatosis observed in Labrea hepatitis. Among the 21 cases histologically examined they found 13 cases with morula cells (Labrea hepatitis), 84% of whom had delta infection. In the eight cases of extensive necrosis there was a 62% incidence of delta infection. The authors conclude that both forms of acute hepatic failure can be attributed to delta infection.

There is no doubt that delta infection is prevalent in the region, but this argument is not sufficient to prove that it is the cause of Labrea hepatitis, particularly because delta hepatitis is a worldwide infection known to produce, on occasion, a classic fulminant hepatitis with massive necrosis. Why, then, do . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?