You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 6, February 12, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Artificial Heart Implantation: What Limitations Are Imposed by Infectious Complications?

Louis B. Rice, MD; Adolf W. Karchmer, MD

JAMA. 1988;259(6):894-895.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Recently, the interests and efforts of the scientific community to support or replace the severely dysfunctioning heart for variable periods have focused on the implantable total artificial heart (TAH) and the mechanical ventricular assist pump (VAP). Despite important technical advances in biomaterials, in the mechanical aspects of the devices, and in power sources, life-threatening thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, and infectious complications were promptly noted in association with use of these devices. Furthermore, use of the TAH was made difficult by the limited space available for its implantation within the thorax, while use of the VAP was restricted by its extracorporeal placement. Concurrent with the efforts to develop these mechanical devices, orthotopic cardiac transplantation became a reality. By the end of 1985, an international registry reported that 2577 patients had received cardiac transplants and that four-year survival among those heart recipients treated with cyclosporine was, by actuarial analysis, 76%.1 The successes of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

New England Deaconess Hospital Harvard Medical School Boston



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.