You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 259 No. 7, February 19, 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ultrasound in Prostatic Cancer-Reply

John M. Palmer, MD
University of California, Davis School of Medicine

JAMA. 1988;259(7):1015.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

— Dr Cooner's comments about the improved capabilities in ultrasonic prostate imaging are well taken. I agree that biplane imaging and higher-frequency transducers have enhanced the versatility of this diagnostic modality in recent years. Unfortunately, I am still not aware of any clinical studies that convincingly support prostatic ultrasound as a dependable diagnostic screen for early prostatic cancer. For this reason, I stand behind my statement that the modality "appears to be of little use in the diagnosis of early prostatic cancer." . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.