 |
 |

Radon—Getting the Dosimetry Right-Reply
William R. Hendee, PhD
American Medical Association Chicago
JAMA. 1988;260(21):3128.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply.—
Drs Toohey and Watson point out that the COUNCIL REPORT equates a radon exposure of 1.3 pCi/L to a lung dose of 8.7 mrem rather than the intended value of 8.7 rem. We discovered this error when the article appeared, published an erratum (JAMA 1988;259:47), and corrected the reprints by calculating the dose for 1.3 pCi/L from first principles rather than using Sorensen's value. The result of 3.1 to 4.6 rem, depending on assumptions about equilibrium, is consistent with Drs Toohey and Watson's estimate of 2.4 rem for 1pCi/L.
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|