This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

George E. Taffet, MD; Thomas A. Teasdale, MPH; Robert J. Luchi, MD
Veterans Administration Medical Center Houston, Tex

JAMA. 1989;261(11):1581-1582.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

We applaud the efforts of Evers et al, Gregory and Dunn, and Draur and encourage additional studies. Their information assists in meaningful and informed dialogue between patients, families, and physicians in each respective setting. Revealing the differences between populations highlights the importance of our caveats concerning widespread application of our findings. The contribution of future studies will be uncertain without reporting arrest definition, selection ratio, and relationships between gender and outcome. The data in all three studies are notably consistent with other cited CPR studies: the 70 years and older group did more poorly, although ageassociated differences were not statistically significant.

Drs Rutherford and Sherman have difficulty in two areas of interpretation with our study. While we submit that a prospective study would allow the neurological consequences of CPR to be assessed more directly, we still believe that our implication that the elderly frequently regain cardiac, but lesser . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?