This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Daniel Wikler, PhD; Alan J. Weisbard, JD

JAMA. 1989;261(15):2246.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Youngner et al¹ report in this issue of THE JOURNAL that even the experts are having trouble understanding the concept of "brain death." More than one third of surveyed physicians responsible for identifying "brain dead" patients and declaring them dead were unable to identify irreversible loss of all brain function as the criterion of death and to apply it to two simple cases. The same was true of nearly three fourths of another group of medical residents, anesthesiologists, and nurses who work in the areas of intensive care and transplantation. Those surveyed varied widely in their concepts of death. These results are troubling, coming as they do 8 years after publication of the President's Commission report,² which formulated and argued for a whole-brain definition of death endorsed by the American Medical Association and the American Bar Association and subsequently enacted by most state legislatures.

Care must be taken . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
University of Wisconsin Medical School Madison; New Jersey Commission on Legal and Ethical Problems in the Delivery of Health Care Trenton

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?