This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Cory Franklin, MD; Eric C. Rackow, MD
University of Health Sciences/ The Chicago Medical School North Chicago, Ill

JAMA. 1989;261(17):2500.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor. —

In the article entitled "The Early Effect of Medicare's Prospective Payment System on the Use of Medical Intensive Care Services in Three Community Hospitals,"1 the authors conclude "that within an increasingly cost-conscious hospital environment, ICU [intensive care unit] bed availability decreased and physicians discharged MICU [medical intensive care unit] patients earlier without affecting in-hospital or six-month mortality or severity of illness in the MICU." These conclusions deserve scrutiny. The Prospective Payment System serves basically as a form of implicit rationing imposed on hospitals and physicians. What the current study and other studies the authors cite show is that when ICU beds are rationed within certain limits, physicians can adjust their admitting patterns with no attendant increase in the mortality of ICU patients. This is not the same as demonstrating no detrimental effects when ICU beds are rationed, since those most affected by rationing are the patients . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?