This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Clement J. McDonald, MD

JAMA. 1989;261(19):2834-2836.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Computer-based medical records promise to solve many of the access and legibility problems of the traditional paper chart. They can also influence the quality of care by calling attention to adverse trends and unattended medical problems reflected in the electronic chart. A small but increasing number of institutions are using such computer-based medical record systems and studying their effects on the efficiency and quality of care.¹ Computer systems do improve the availability of medical records—from 85% to 99% in one study.² However, they do not necessarily save patient and staff time. In the same study, the time spent in the clinic by patients who had computer-stored records increased by more than 5%, compared with the time spent by control patients, who had paper records.² This increase, however, may have been a side effect of a better quality of care. Patients in the study group had a greater . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?