 |
 |

An Isolated Total Cholesterol Level Is Inadequate
Richard C. Keniston, MD
William Beaumont Army Medical Center El Paso, Tex
JAMA. 1989;261(22):3241-3242.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor.—
In her commentary on cholesterol screening, Ms Merz1 discusses the need for lipoprotein analysis, in addition to total cholesterol measurements. As a military pathologist, I have been involved with autopsies on four middle-aged men who have died of acute myocardial infarction while exercising. None of these men has had a total cholesterol level greater than 6.21 mmol/L by the Lipid Research Clinics method,2 although the two with high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) values both had cholesterol/HDL-C ratios greater than 4.00, including the one with a total cholesterol level greater than 5.17 mmol/L. Since most patients who die of cardiovascular disease at this medical center also do not have elevated total cholesterol levels, I began to question the reliability of isolated total cholesterol measurements.
First, I looked at 1-month mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease who survived to admission and who had total cholesterol levels measured. Only
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|