 |
 |

Dermatologic Conditions Misdiagnosed as Evidence of Child Abuse
Peter J. Koblenzer, MD
St Christopher's Hospital for Children Philadelphia, Pa
JAMA. 1989;261(24):3547-3548.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor. —
The report by Mss Herman-Giddens and Berson1 documenting traumatic genital care practices in children emphasizes once more the many and varied forms of child abuse. The putative numbers are mind-boggling and the harm done is immeasurable. As physicians, we must strive to the utmost to alleviate this intolerable situation, but scientific objectivity must not be sacrificed.
I refer to case 3 in the article by Mss Herman-Giddens and Berson. It is clear that the behavior of the father is inappropriate and potentially harmful to the girl's psychosexual development. Examination of the photograph, however, points to a diagnosis of juvenile lichen sclerosus et atrophicus rather than the steroid effect suggested in the text. Of unknown etiology, evolution of the lesions takes place over a period of years, and resolution might not be complete until puberty. Symptoms that include burning micturition and chronic pruritus are common. I
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|