You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 261 No. 24, June 23, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Dermatologic Conditions Misdiagnosed as Evidence of Child Abuse-Reply

Marcia E. Herman-Giddens, PA, MPH; Nancy L. Berson
Duke University Medical Center Durham, NC

JAMA. 1989;261(24):3548.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus is one of a number of diagnoses that can be mistaken for evidence of sexual abuse. We appreciate the comments of Drs Anders, Smith, and Koblenzer in providing the opportunity to discuss this condition. As the authors point out, misdiagnosis in child abuse may have even more serious ramifications than in many other areas of pediatrics. It is paramount that professionals who specialize in child abuse be familiar with differential diagnoses that include other conditions that might present as apparent physical or sexual abuse. Indeed, one must be familiar with endocrinologic and metabolic disorders, inflammatory bowel diseases, and infectious diseases as well as the field of dermatology. We, too, have seen several patients with lichen sclerosus et atrophicus who have been mistakenly diagnosed and referred to us because it was believed that the children were being abused sexually. Recently, we evaluated a 6-year-old girl . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.