This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Willcox Kirkland Ruffin, MD
Naval Hospital Millington, Tenn

JAMA. 1989;261(5):696.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Surgical and medical treatment of the patient with breast cancer has changed dramatically in the past two decades. The Halsted radical mastectomy has been replaced by the modified radical mastectomy, and, more recently, evidence has appeared supporting segmental mastectomy as an acceptable alternative when combined with axillary dissection and postoperative radiation therapy.

The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project has performed numerous studies attempting to resolve the dilemma surrounding the various treatments. One such study, protocol B-04, compared radical mastectomy and total mastectomy with and without radiation therapy. The results showed no significant difference in overall survival when comparing the three treatment arms.¹ Of equal importance, the data indicated that surgical removal of the axillary lymph nodes was useful for staging but did not benefit survival, supporting the theory that breast cancer is a systemic disease and that involved axillary nodes serve only as a marker of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?