This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Eric Koscove, MD
Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center

Norman Paradis, MD
Henry Ford Hospital Detroit

JAMA. 1989;261(7):990-991.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply. —

We appreciate the attention devoted to our report by Drs Lacy and Kostis. However, we differ with them on some of their points. A review of our cases reveals that both patients did indeed fail to respond to conventional therapy. First, we stated that the patients failed to respond to "standard therapy": this includes at least one or more standard doses of epinephrine, as well as other drugs and defibrillation. In case 1, even using the definition of "response" proposed by Drs Lacy and Kostis, the patient's junctional bradycardia present after intubation "deteriorated to fine VF, and 1 mg of epinephrine... was given. Defibrillation... was performed with no change in rhythm"; ie, the patient failed this "round" of conventional therapy. Whether the patient responded (using the definition of Drs Lacy and Kostis) to later rounds of conventional therapy cannot be determined unequivocally.

We also note some inconsistency . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?