This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (52)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Elizabeth R. McAnarney, MD; William R. Hendee, PhD

JAMA. 1989;262(1):74-77.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MUCH has been written about adolescent pregnancy and childbearing during the last decade. The facts are clear and distressing: In 1982, 1 077 124 pregnancies occurred in 15- to 19-year-old adolescents; 513 758 (47%) ended in live births, 418 740 (39%) in therapeutic abortions, and 144 626 (13%) in spontaneous abortions. Of all live births to adolescents, nearly 48% were born to unmarried women.¹ In 1984, fewer (469 682) children were born to women younger than 19 years, but this decrease resulted primarily from a reduction in the adolescent age group.²

Compared with other developed countries, the United States exhibits significantly higher pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates in its adolescent population. In 1981, for example, the adolescent pregnancy rate for women 15 to 19 years old was 96/1000 in the United States compared with 14/1000 in the Netherlands. The comparison of rates from a country as heterogeneous as . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Rochester (NY) Medical Center (Dr McAnarney); and the Group on Science and Technology, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill (Dr Hendee).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to the Group on Science and Technology, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (Dr Hendee).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?