 |
 |

Think 'Trismus-Pseudocamptodactyly,' Say 'Dutch-Kentucky.' But 'Dutch-Kennedy'?-Reply
Stanley I. Samuels, MD
Stanford (Calif) University Medical Center
JAMA. 1989;262(10):1327.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply.—
I was intrigued and somewhat concerned by Dr Trimble's failure to find any reference to the Dutch-Kentucky syndrome, since my initial review of some standard texts also failed to reveal the existence of this disorder.1 On further exploration, I was relieved to discover that the syndrome was in fact alive and well. It was originally described in 1968.2,3 However, it may be better known to your erudite readers as the trismus-pseudocamptodactyly syndrome or Dutch-Kentucky syndrome.4
The point I wished to make in my review of Anesthesia and Co-existing Disease was that the text discussed in fine detail the problems in anesthesia, ranging from the exquisitely rare (hence Dutch-Kentucky syndrome) to the more commonplace. I thank Dr Trimble's keen eye for helping to emphasize this point. I will leave the elucidation of the Dutch-Kennedy syndrome to others.
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|