This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Barbara Staub, MD
White Bear Lake, Minn

JAMA. 1989;262(18):2539.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

I have no quarrel with the conclusions drawn by Chervenak and McCullough.¹ I disagree strongly, however, with some of the assertions they made along the way.

A major premise is that the fetus will require intelligence to be valued as a human being. I take strong exception to their reference to "survival that confers no or only very little benefit, because it is very probable that the purpose of survival, cognitive development, is not achievable."

Are we to understand that cognitive development is the purpose of survival?

As mother of a son who was born "normal," but achieved no developmental milestones, and indeed lost some, I find that assertion troubling. While he lived, our son was as entitled to life— and to society's protection—as anyone else. If anything, he needed more protection, because he was unable to defend himself. In his life he knew love, and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?