This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (2)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Condict Moore, MD

JAMA. 1989;262(2):259-260.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

GOVERNMENT and the insurance industry have intruded in recent years into the delicate, crucial relationship between physicians and patients. The primary physician's ability to play an unbiased role in the decisions about optimum care and a patient's faith in one physician's capacity to manage important health matters are disappearing.¹ Experts foresee no relief from this medical care muddle (New York Times. May 2, 1988:26).^2-4 When major disease strikes today, care is revealed to be patterned by quasi-medical and nonmedical forces. Optimum care becomes rationed by the size and wealth of each medical care complex.⁵ Routine care often follows this dictum: treat at local facilities until things go badly, then refer (this can waste money and often harms patients). The patient is caught in the middle.

Primary physicians working in this new milieu struggle to sustain complete commitment to patient welfare.⁶ To survive, many primary physicians today . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the J. Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, Ky.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to J. Graham Brown Cancer Center, 529 S Jackson St, Louisville, KY 40202 (Dr Moore).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?