 |
 |

Immunology, Contraception, and Preeclampsia
Alan E. Beer, MD
JAMA. 1989;262(22):3184.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
At the beginning of this century, it was suggested that the etiology of preeclampsia/eclampsia had an immunologic component. The hypothesis advanced was that preeclampsia/ eclampsia reflected either a partial breakdown of the mechanisms responsible for the normal exemption of the fetoplacental unit from rejection as an allograft or an immunologic response directed against tissue- or organ-specific antigens associated with the placenta.1 Since then, increasingly sophisticated investigations that have paralleled new developments in immunobiology have furthered our understanding of the immunobiology of the maternal-fetal relationship and thereby this condition.
There are cogent immunologic explanations for the basic observations regarding preeclampsia/eclampsia.2 The immunologic factors contributing to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia/eclampsia suggest that this disorder is most likely to arise in a woman who (1) becomes pregnant early in her coital experience and is confronted initially with a large, healthy placenta whose size and invasive propensity of its trophoblast cells in
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
University of Health Sciences/ The Chicago Medical School North Chicago, Ill
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|