You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.

ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In

Vol. 262 No. 23, December 15, 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
 •  Online Features
Letters
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

School-Based Clinics' Birth, Fertility, and Abortion Rates-Reply

Janice M. Fleszar; William R. Hendee, PhD
American Medical Association Chicago, Ill

JAMA. 1989;262(23):3271.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

Dr Cullen is correct in pointing out that the impact of the St Paul program was measured in terms of a reduction in birth rate rather than fertility rate. However, program staff in St Paul do not believe that the dramatic reduction in births between 1976-1977 and 1983-1984 can be explained by an increase in abortions. This belief is reinforced by a decline in positive tests for pregnancy identified over this period. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.