 |
 |

Medicine in Defense Against Biological Warfare
David L. Huxsoll, DVM, PhD;
Cheryl D. Parrott;
William C. Patrick III, MS
JAMA. 1989;262(5):677-679.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
IT IS fitting in this issue of THE JOURNAL that we turn our attention to another means of mass destruction—biological warfare. This method of warfare, first used in the sixth century BC,1 is widely available, easily obtained, silent, and invisible. Whether it be a fraction of a microgram of lethal toxin inhaled by one person or a drifting cloud that can kill or incapacitate tens of thousands, the potential threat of biological warfare is clear. In this commentary, we explain why research in medical defenses against this threat is needed as we answer yes to Orient's2 question, "Should medical defenses against biological warfare be researched?"
We define biological warfare as the use of microorganisms or toxins derived from living organisms to produce death or disease in humans, animals, or plants. This definition is compatible with the National Security Decisions signed in 1969 and 1970, in which the United
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
From the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Md.
Footnotes
The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as reflecting the views of the Department of the Army or the Department of Defense.
Reprint requests to the US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Ft Detrick, Frederick, MD 21701-5011 (Dr Huxsoll).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|