This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Millard Bass, DO, MPH, ScD
Brooklyn, NY

JAMA. 1989;262(9):1184-1185.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor. —

Allen et al¹ make one assumption concerning postneonatal sudden infant death with which I do not agree. They assume that sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) can be verified by autopsy. However, SIDS is an exclusionary diagnosis that requires careful death-scene investigation.² There are no shortcuts; the investigation should include an on-site environmental assessment. Unfortunately, the authors did not collect detailed deathscene information on the circumstances surrounding death in the SIDS cases. The source of the SIDS diagnosis in their small study was frequently death certificate data.³

The Georgia Post-Mortem Examination Act allows medical examiners to perform autopsies and conduct deathscene investigations on infants who die presumptively of SIDS. It is surprising that, with the great advances in neonatal survival in Georgia and with the tremendous cost in the intensive care of critically ill newborns, nearly half of the infants in this study who . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?