This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David P. Kilgore, MD
Dallas, Tex

JAMA. 1990;263(13):1767.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Several of the assumptions by Eisenberg et al¹ cast doubt on the validity of their conclusions that new diagnostic methods do not displace, but rather are performed in addition to, older methods.

I question the appropriateness of comparing the radionuclide brain scan to brain computed tomography (CT). A more valid study would compare the incidence of pneumoencephalography and cerebral angiography (the primary neuroimaging studies of the pre-CT era) in 1974 with their incidences in 1980. Pneumoencephalography was performed daily in the preCT era in institutions with active neurology and neurosurgery practices; it was completely discarded within 5 to 6 years of the introduction of CT. The incidence of cerebral angiography has also declined dramatically since the advent of CT.

The period studied, 1978 through 1980, was one of rapid change in the capabilities of both CT and ultrasound devices. Many of the devices in use then . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?