You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 20, May 23, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Council Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (20)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Conflicts of Interest in Medical Center/Industry Research Relationships

Council on Scientific Affairs and Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs

JAMA. 1990;263(20):2790-2793.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CONFLICT of interest in clinical research defies simple definition: one researcher's conflict of interest may be another's mutually beneficial working relationship.1 Conflict of interest must be clearly distinguished from scientific misconduct. The generally recognized patterns that constitute misconduct in science include plagiarism, deception, falsification, and/or fabrication of scientific data. Scientific misconduct compromises the integrity of the biomedical research process.

On the other hand, conflict of interest involves a distinct subset of issues. Conflict of interest is defined by Webster's Third New International Dictionary as "a conflict between the private interests and official responsibilities of a person in a position of trust." Although conflicts of interest may arise in any research relationship, they are most likely to occur when a researcher enters into a financial arrangement with a profit-making corporation. In that situation, the researcher's dedication to the advancement of medical knowledge may collide with the researcher's desire to increase . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago, III.


Footnotes

This report was approved by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association in December 1989 as a policy report of the Council on Scientific Affairs and the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.

This report is not intended to be construed or to serve as a standard of medical care. Standards of medical care are determined on the basis of all of the facts and circumstances involved in an individual case and are subject to change as scientific knowledge and technology advance and patterns of practice evolve. This report reflects the views of scientific literature as of November 1989.

Reprint requests to the Council on Scientific Affairs, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (William R. Hendee, PhD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.