You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 263 No. 21, June 6, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (7)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reaching the Readers: Experience With the AMA Specialty Journals

Michael D. Springer; George D. Lundberg, MD; John T. Baker; Thomas J. Carroll

JAMA. 1990;263(21):2931-2933.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The average physician in the United States receives a large number of medical publications each month. Some appear because the physician deliberately bought a subscription. Some are received as a benefit of membership in one or more professional organizations. And some simply arrive in the mail as a result of "controlled circulation," because his or her name is on some list of physicians who share certain practice characteristics deemed desirable by the publisher.

Conventional wisdom has held that physicians are more likely to read and value publications they have deliberately purchased. However, some time ago a substantial body of information available to the commercial world began to question that point of view. Syndicated reader research suggested high readership for some publications received on a controlled basis. Sadly, the publications with the highest scores often were not the "worthy" peer-reviewed scientific journals; instead, they were tabloids and specialty magazines that are . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Scientific Information Group (Mr Springer and Dr Lundberg) and the Publishing Group (Messrs Baker and Carroll), American Medical Association, Chicago, III.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Office of Specialty Journals, American Medical Association, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610 (Mr Springer).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.