This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ellice Lieberman, MD, DrPH; Kenneth J. Ryan, MD; Richard R. Monson
Harvard School of Public Health Boston, Mass

Stephen C. Schoenbaum
Harvard Community Health Plan Boston, Mass

JAMA. 1990;263(9):1200-1201.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Klebanoff et al,¹ in the July 28 issue of JAMA, examined hematocrit and preterm birth to determine if that association is an artifact related to changes in maternal hematocrit during pregnancy. We appreciate their efforts in attempting to resolve this difficult issue. In our initial consideration of this problem,^2,3 we also were concerned about possible artifact and examined the literature and our data to determine if changes in maternal hematocrit during pregnancy were a likely explanation for our results. In the literature, we did not find support for the substantial increases in hematocrit between 25 to 30 weeks and term suggested by Klebanoff et al. Several articles^4-6 report changes of 1.1 percent or less between 25 to 30 weeks and term. Nilsen et al,⁷ who Klebanoff et al cite as noting larger changes, actually found maximum hemoglobin level increases of 5 g/L (a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?