You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 264 No. 10, September 12, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical News & Perspectives

JAMA. 1990;264(10):1225-1234.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

New Antirejection Drugs Anticipated

TRANSPLANTATION is rapidly approaching a "postcyclosporine era," just 7 years after this potent immunosuppressive drug launched transplantation from experimental science into mainstream medicine.

Recently, several new compounds—molecular daughters and granddaughters of cyclosporine—have proven in animal models to be safe and even more potent and effective than cyclosporine. Three in particular—FK506 (Fujisawa Pharmaceutical Co, Tsukuba, Japan), RS-61443 (Syntex Corp, Palo Alto, Calif), and rapamycin (Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa)—drew attention at the International Congress of the Transplantation Society in San Francisco, Calif last month.

Most exciting was the evidence that these drugs act at different stages along the rejection pathway, including the stimulation and proliferation of lymphocytes and the production of antibodies. They appear to work synergistically with each other and with cyclosporine, with one notable exception: the toxic combination of FK506 and cyclosporine. It is hoped the additive effect of these drugs in low concentrations . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.