This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

James W. Marshall, DO
West Haven, Conn

JAMA. 1990;264(10):1247-1248.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The article regarding student loan indebtedness¹ overlooked several issues we "new" physicians must face. Having attended school from 1981 through 1985, I was influenced in my borrowing by several factors that later changed. Foremost among these were income averaging and tax deductibility of student loans. When my residency was complete and all deferments were past, so too was any hope of obtaining any tax breaks from the huge debt incurred for obtaining my degree. It seems paradoxical to penalize students and starting practitioners with ever-increasing tuition and longer residencies, while eliminating methods of off-setting debts our predecessors enjoyed.

At least the present trainees know not to expect any break from the federal government. It's a sad day when a board-certified internist in his second year of practice is turned down by four banks (including the one holding my Health Education Assistance Loan [HEAL]) for a car . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?