You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 264 No. 14, October 10, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Law and Medicine
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Decisions to Abate Life-Sustaining Treatment for Nonautonomous Patients

Ethical Standards and Legal Liability for Physicians After Cruzan

Robert F. Weir, PhD; Larry Gostin, JD

JAMA. 1990;264(14):1846-1853.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PHYSICIANS often feel impelled to initiate and continue the complete range of modern medical procedures to prolong the lives of critically ill patients. A tragic consequence is that patients who lack decision-making capacity are sometimes given life-sustaining treatment that is not consistent with the patients' previous preferences, not in the patients' best interests, and not wanted by their families.

Why are such cases sometimes handled this way? The reasons are multiple. First, cases involving adult patients who lack decision-making capacity often have medical and nonmedical uncertainties not commonly present in other cases. Some of the uncertainty concerns the questionable decision-making status of patients who have a diminished or fluctuating capacity to make health care decisions because of shock, mental illness, clinical depression, or organic brain syndrome. Other problems arise in cases with patients who have a substantial incapacity to make decisions because of mental retardation, brain damage, severe dementia, or . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Program in Biomedical Ethics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City (Dr Weir), and the American Society of Law and Medicine, Boston, Mass (Mr Gostin).


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Program in Biomedical Ethics, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52242 (Dr Weir).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.