You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 264 No. 2, July 11, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intradermal vs Intramuscular Hepatitis B Vaccinations

Johan Wiström, MD; Bo Settergren, MD, PhD; Ake Gustafsson, MD, PhD; Per Juto, MD, PhD; R. S. Norrby, MD, PhD
University Hospital of Umeå Umeå, Sweden

JAMA. 1990;264(2):181-182.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

A high response rate after intradermal (ID) vaccination with the plasma-derived hepatitis B vaccine has been demonstrated in several trials.1-3 To study the immunogenicity of a DNA-recombinant hepatitis B vaccine we initiated a controlled, randomized, open trial in which 80 healthy medical students and hospital employees who gave verbal consent were randomized to either ID vaccination in the forearm with 2 µg or intramuscular (IM) vaccination in the deltoid muscle with 10 µg of DNA-recombinant hepatitis B vaccine (Recombivax-HB, Merck Sharp & Formula Dohme, West Point, Pa, expiration date December 1988). Vaccinations were performed by two experienced nurses at 0,1, and 6 months between December 1987 and September 1988. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen, and antibody to HBsAg (expressed as international units [IU/L] according to the World Health Organization standard) were analyzed by radioimmunoassay. Thirty-eight subjects (20 women and 18 men) with a mean age of 30.1 years (range, 21 to 50 years) and 37 subjects (20 women and 17 men) with a mean age of 29.4 years (range, 20 to 55 years) could be analyzed for efficacy in the ID and IM groups, respectively. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.