You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 264 No. 24, December 26, 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Peer Review and Dissenting Manuscripts: The Cantekin Case-Reply

Erdem I. Cantekin, PhD; Timothy W. McGuire, PhD
Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, Pa

Robert L. Potter, JD
Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Potter Pittsburgh, Pa

JAMA. 1990;264(24):3144-3145.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

The manuscript in question was originally drafted by Dr Cantekin as a competing analysis of the AB-OME-I data for consideration within the Otitis Media Research Center. At the time, Dr Cantekin was the director of research of the Department of Pediatric Otolaryngology at Children's Hospital. Drs Bluestone and Mandel, who were listed as first and second authors, rejected Dr Cantekin's analysis and instead sent their own manuscript, Mandel et al, to the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) as the report of the Otitis Media Research Center.

Dr Cantekin revised his manuscript with statistical assistance from Dr McGuire, deputy dean of the GSTA at Carnegie Mellon University. That manuscript was sent to the NEJM with a cover letter in which "(1) Cantekin referred to the OMRC [Otitis Media Research Center] manuscript submitted the month before... (2) Cantekin stated that he was a coinvestigator who had not succeeded . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.