This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David M. Eddy, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1991;265(1):105-108.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

RESOLVING our conflict about health care costs will require connecting value to cost.^1,2 Ideally, the connection should be made through individual decisions in the marketplace—each individual would be responsible for paying the financial cost of the health care services he or she chooses to receive. This would force each of us to weigh the value of those services (their benefits and harms) against the cost we would have to pay and would ensure that, both for the individual and for society as a whole, the value of health care would be worth its cost.

Unfortunately, in medicine the connection between value and cost has been cut by some basic flaws in the medical marketplace, most notably third-party coverage, third-party advice, and uncertainty. Individuals do make decisions, but they are based on imperfect perceptions of the benefits, without appreciation of the true costs. The inevitable result is what we see . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Duke University Durham, NC

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Skyline Route, Box 32, Jackson, WY 83001 (Dr Eddy).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?