You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 2, January 9, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Denial and Silent Ischemia: Which Comes First?

P. Janne, PhD; C. Reynaert, MD; P. Decoster, MD
University Hospital of Mont-Godinne (Belgium)

JAMA. 1991;265(2):213.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor. —

In a Special Communication of September 5 about silent myocardial ischemia, Barsky et al1 emphasize the importance of the person in the so-called silent ischemia syndrome. They summarize interesting previous findings about symptom perception, appraisal, and reporting that can be taken into account to explain the absence of anginal symptoms in these patients.

However, they state that "a link between denial and silent ischemia is yet to be established." Actually, it has been. We published empirical evidence supporting the hypothesis of such an "undercomplaining behaviour pattern" in silent myocardial ischemia.2 Our answer to the question "What is actually silent in asymptomatic coronary artery disease, the patient himself or the ischemia?" was that patients with silent myocardial ischemia deny not only pain but also sickness, illness seriousness, and even the presence of a cardiac disease.

Confirmatory data were published in a second study,3 which . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.