You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 265 No. 21, June 5, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (8)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Medical Injury Compensation A Time for Testing New Approaches

Walter Wadlington, LLB

JAMA. 1991;265(21):2861.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Despite an improved climate for professional liability insurance, medical injury compensation remains a subject of serious concern. The current tort system has been assailed as too slow, too costly, too complicated, and inconsistent in awards. Some critics assert that it induces overutilization through "defensive" medicine while limiting access by influencing physicians to forgo high-risk procedures or to shift to specialties with less liability exposure. Many medical practitioners also contend that it often stigmatizes physicians unfairly.

Legislative reform in the 1970s and 1980s produced changes in the tort system in response to perceived crises arising from the increasing cost and diminishing availability of professional liability insurance. Because of limited understanding about the nature and dimensions of the problems at which they were directed, it was highly conjectural whether those remedies would effect anything close to a cure.

Today's situation differs significantly. We now have a significant body of research, and such . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the University of Virgina School of Law, Charlottesville.


Footnotes

The views expressed herein are the author's, and no official endorsement by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation should be inferred.

Reprint requests to the University of Virginia School of Law, Arlington Blvd at Massie Rd, Charlottesville VA 22901 (Mr Wadlington).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.