This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Edmund D. Pellegrino, MD

JAMA. 1991;265(23):3118-3119.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

"Euthanasia" is today the most intensively discussed and divisive topic in medical ethics. This review summarizes the present state of the question, the events that precipitated it, the arguments on both sides, and the ethical assumptions behind those arguments.

There are several construals of the term euthanasia, but only two will be considered herein: active euthanasia, ie, the intentional termination of a patient's life by a physician, with or without the patient's consent, and assisted suicide, ie, the provision by a physician of the means by which patients can end their own lives.¹ Passive euthanasia, ie, withholding or withdrawing life-support measures, is outside the scope of this review.² Since the aim of the Contempo series is to survey pertinent literature, I will not argue my own position.

Any study of euthanasia must examine current social policy in the Netherlands. A decade ago this country became the first in . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Center for the Advanced Study of Ethics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?