This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Donald A. Redelmeier, MD
Stanford University Palo Alto, Calif

JAMA. 1991;265(4):458.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor. —

Park et al¹ present a sophisticated analysis describing factors that influence hospital death rate. Such research helps place current assessments of hospital performance in proper perspective. However, their simulation model of randomness may be misleading. By invoking crude age-sex-race estimates of death rate, the article may have exaggerated the element of chance and thereby underestimated the importance of quality of care.

Consider a hypothetical cohort of 100 patients with congestive heart failure (Table). The age-sex-race probability of death for each patient is 5%. However, the cohort actually contains 95 patients with an excellent prognosis (probability of death, 1%) and five patients with a dismal prognosis (probability of death, 80%). Calculation using the refined probability estimates yields an expected death rate of five patients. Calculation using the crude age-sex-race probability yields a similar number of deaths. However, the variance of the first estimate would be much . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?