This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Mark G. Jameson, MD, MPH
Hagerstown, Md

JAMA. 1991;265(8):974.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The recent excellent article by Piper et al¹ documents the absence of improvements in use of early prenatal care, birth weight, or neonatal mortality with expanded Medicaid eligibility in Tennessee. This study and an accompanying editorial by Guyer² describe a variety of reasons for the lack of health status improvement with the removal of financial barriers to obtaining prenatal care.

The results are actually not surprising, but clearly illustrate that policy-makers in government, public health, and medicine have overlooked a vital risk factor for low birth weight and neonatal morbidity and mortality: voluntary, deleterious maternal behavior. Indeed, behaviors such as cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, illicit drug use, "junk food" nutrition, obesity, and adolescent pregnancy all affect the newborn's health. No amount of openended or expanded Medicaid funding can correct this.

The data demonstrate that we have reached the point of diminishing returns, with funding directed . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Footnotes
Edited by Drummond Rennie, MD, Deputy Editor (West), and Don Riesenberg, MD, Senior Editor.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?