You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 3, July 17, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Law and Medicine
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Advance Directives on Admission Clinical Implications and Analysis of the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990

John La Puma, MD; David Orentlicher, MD, JD; Robert J. Moss, MD

JAMA. 1991;266(3):402-405.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

DESPITE widespread acknowledgment of the need for individuals to draft living wills, durable powers of attorney, or other advance directives, few Americans have done so. To encourage patients to complete advance directives, Congress enacted the Patient Self-Determination Act (hereafter "the Act") last October. The Act takes effect on December 1,1991, and requires hospitals, nursing homes, and hospices to advise patients on admission of their right to accept or refuse medical care and to execute an advance directive. Managed care organizations and home health care agencies must provide the same information to each of their members on members' enrollment. Provider organizations will also be required to (1) document whether patients have advance directives, (2) implement advance directive policies, and (3) educate their staffs and communities about advance directives. Compliance with the Act is a condition for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and is tied to institutional . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Lutheran General Hospital Center for Clinical Ethics (Drs La Puma and Moss); and Section of Geriatric Medicine (Dr Moss), Park Ridge, Ill; and the Office of the General Counsel, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill (Dr Orentlicher).


Footnotes

The views expressed are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Lutheran General Hospital, Lutheran General Medical Group, or the American Medical Association.

Reprint requests to Director, Center for Clinical Ethics, 1775 Dempster St, Park Ridge, IL 60068 (Dr La Puma).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.