This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

On Balance, More Help Than Hindrance

Margot L. White, JD; John C. Fletcher, PhD

JAMA. 1991;266(3):410-412.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The Patient Self-Determination Act (hereafter, the Act), which takes effect on December 1,1991, creates no new rights for patients or for citizens generally. The law requires Medicare/Medicaid-receiving health care providers to inform patients of their existing rights under state law to refuse treatment and prepare advance directives. By doing so, it merely affirms principles that have their roots in both common law and constitutional law dating back to the late 19th century. ("[N]o right is held more sacred, or is more carefully guarded, by the common law, than the right of every individual to the possession and control of his person, free from all restraint or interference of others, unless by clear and unquestionable authority of law."¹) Legal and ethical principles that govern decision making about medical treatment, familiar to most clinicians as the doctrine of informed consent, have played a significant role in clinical decision making for decades . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville (Ms White), and The Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville (Ms White and Dr Fletcher).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to The Center for Biomedical Ethics, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Box 348. Charlottesville, VA 22908 (Ms White).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?