You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 266 No. 6, August 14, 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Questions About DNR Orders

LCDR David Leivers, MC
USN Naval Hospital Department of Anesthesia San Diego, Calif

JAMA. 1991;266(6):795.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The recent update of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines1 and editorial comment2 are welcome as further developments in this complicated and evolving area. However, many specific problems were not addressed. Truog3 reviewed the question of the status of DNR orders in patients undergoing surgery and anesthesia. For anesthesiologists, there are special and frequently conflicting aspects of providing care during palliative surgery. The following case highlights this dilemma:

A 54-year-old man with endstage amyotrophic lateral sclerosis presented for gastrostomy. He was fully alert but confined to a wheelchair. He lived at home with his caring wife. His profound weakness did not permit coordinated swallowing, and his decline was being accelerated by malnutrition. Respiratory reserve was negligible with PaO2 of 56 mm Hg breathing air and PaCO2 of 54 mm Hg. In a discussion prior to the procedure, the patient and his wife revealed an . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

Supported by the United States Navy, Clinical Investigation Program report No 84-16-1968-278.

The views expressed in this letter are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the US government.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.