 |
 |

Limiting Specific Interventions in Advance Directives-Reply
Allen S. Brett, MD
Harvard Medical School Boston, Mass
JAMA. 1992;267(1):52.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
In Reply.
—I appreciate Dr Lariviere's thoughtful comments, and I agree with many of them. His opening sentence, however, is misleading. My article discussed the limitations of listing specific interventions in advance directives, not "the limitations of health values forms." I am also puzzled by an apparent contradiction. He objects (as I do) to the way in which lists of requested interventions in advance directives might be construed as implying a right to medically inappropriate therapies. Yet, earlier in the letter he suggests a strategy in which a list of interventions should be honored "when the patient's condition seems hopeless."
Mr Barnett and I clearly share a commitment to the goal of respecting patients' wishes. But I continue to believe that a thorough exploration of a patient's general preferences for treatment in the event of incapacity will be sufficient in most cases. During the actual period of decision making after
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|