This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Robert J. Volk, PhD; Scott B. Cantor, PhD; Jeffrey R. Steinbauer, MD
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston

JAMA. 1992;267(23):3153.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In a recent issue of JAMA, Walsh et al¹ presented findings from a treatment outcome study concerning the impact of a physician's warning of the harmful effects of alcohol on recovery after alcoholism treatment. This study's findings highlighted the potential for physicians in managing their alcohol-abusing patients. This simple intervention—a physician's warning—was significantly related to better patient outcomes above that explained by conventional treatments.

While the findings from this study are encouraging, physicians' recognition of alcohol problems in their patients remains a necessary precursor to intervention. The subjects in this study were all previously identified as alcohol abusers.

A crucial issue in recognition of alcoholism by physicians is the variability in accuracy of available self-report and biochemical screens for alcoholism across patient subgroups, a situation well known to clinical epidemiologists as "spectrum bias."² It is entirely possible that the sensitivity and specificity of available self-report and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?