This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The Triumph of Hope Over Experience

Drummond Rennie, MD; Annette Flanagin, RN, MA

JAMA. 1992;267(3):411-412.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The appearance of an article in the pages of THE JOURNAL is the result of a complex and lengthy process. Scores of people, acting as investigators, funding agents, members of institutional review boards, authors, reviewers, and editors, make decisions that influence what is published. Each decision may be subject to biases: the conscious and subconscious influences that interfere with impartial judgments.

The editors are uncomfortably aware that, for reasons of space and timeliness, the good may often be turned down in favor of the best, but when the final product is published, all concerned like to imagine that their own decisions were free of institutional, hierarchical, political, sexist, racist, and other biases. It has been shown for one journal that these sorts of biases may be largely removed from the editorial process by having reviewers blinded to the names, positions, and institutions of the authors,¹ and an effort is . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California at San Francisco (Dr Rennie), and the Scientific Publications Group, American Medical Association, Chicago, III (Dr Rennie and Ms Flanagin).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Scientific Publications Group, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (Ms Flanagin).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?