You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 267 No. 9, March 4, 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pathophysiology of Upper Airway Closures During Sleep

Ashley Woodcock, MD, MRCP; Patricia Stone, MB, ChB
Mark Atkins Wythenshawe Hospital Manchester, England

JAMA. 1992;267(9):1206-1207.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In their article on the pathophysiology of upper airway closure during sleep, Drs Kuna and Sant'Ambrogio1 seem uncertain about the importance of increased nasal resistance in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). On page 1388, paragraph 1, they comment that"... correction of these nasal problems does not usually resolve OSA" and "Nevertheless, reduction in upstream resistance by treatment of nasal problems is indicated in OSA subjects." The importance of increased nasal resistance in sleep apnea is unclear.

We have measured nasal resistance by anterior rhinomanometry (right nasal resistance, left nasal resistance, and calculated combined nasal resistance), in 141 consecutive patients undergoing polysomnography for symptoms suggestive of OSA. There was no significant difference in combined nasal resistance between patients with OSA (apnea/hypopnea index, >15; mean, 46; n = 71) and snorers (apnea/hypopnea index, <15; mean, 5; n=70). Only six patients had a raised combined nasal resistance (>3 cm H2 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1992 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.