This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JAMA. 1992;268(16):2282-2288.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

CARDIOPULMONARY resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiac care (ECC) have the same goals as all other medical interventions—to preserve life, restore health, relieve suffering, and limit disability. An additional goal unique to CPR is the reversal of "clinical death." However, in providing CPR these goals are often not achieved. Moreover, the provision of resuscitation may conflict with a patients's own desires and requests or may not be in the patient's best interest.¹ Like other medical therapies CPR and ECC have specific indications and contraindications. In certain circumstances CPR can be predicted to be unsuccessful and may be considered futile. In certain instances CPR may not be a wise or just use of limited medical resources. However, concern about costs associated with prolonged intensive care should not preclude emergency resuscitative attempts. The purpose of this section is to guide ECC providers in making difficult decisions about starting and stopping CPR and . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?